A few things that stood out to me were:
- it was based on scientific data, provided by actual scientists
- it covered a wide array of topics including: debunking the myth that CO2 causes GW, why the ice caps melt, the motivation for scientists to develop wild views on GW, and the flaws of models
- it dealt with the myth that 'even if the science is wrong making changes to help the environment will not hurt us'
- it contained interviews from scientists that do not have a political or self promoting agenda
2 comments:
as a conservative, i agree with you on some topics, but enough already with the preachy, superior "global warming isn't real" shpiel you've recycled time and time again. you've stated your opinion many times on the matter; find something else to spew your opinion out on.
anonymous...
"enough already with the preachy, superior "global warming isn't real" shpiel???
I don't talk about GW nearly as often as the media or the GW prophets do. I only discuss issues that are in the media. The preachy crowd are the ones that are telling us to change all of our light bulbs and only use one square of toilet paper.
Post a Comment