All laws distinguish among different kinds of behavior. What other purpose does law have?
While people may be treated the same, all their behaviors are not. Laws that forbid bicycles from being ridden on freeways obviously have a different effect on people who have bicycles but no cars." - Thomas Sowell
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
One perfect example is the pride parade every year in Toronto.
Heterosexual males must be 19 year of age and older to enter a bar where females might be scantly clad , and they can also be arrested if and lewd action take place and the Police bust the join.
BUT , little boys and girls can be dragged to the Diversity event parade and see naked men flaunting their penis in public to other adult males as well, and our Tolerant Mayor allows this child abuse to go on and he orders the Police Chief to stand back and don't arrest any naked Homosexuals exposing themselves to the children.
Now...maybe I'm old fashion but there are no gray areas for Pedophilia , adults that enjoy being naked in front of children have some serious mental issues because they don't see it as harmful.
But don't you dare say that in Toronto because the OHRC will criminalize your opinion if it goes against the Rainbow Militant Agenda to have a quasi-pedophilia action in public deemed a sexual-preference to express Pride over it.
Is it any surprise that the Liberals feared the raising of the Conscent to 16 for sex would criminalize SOME homosexual behaviour , they can't even bring themselve to admit that there are such things as heterosexual/homosexual-pedophiles in Toronto .
The same-gender sexual assaults are just as Illegal as the opposit gender sexual assaults on children.
Nobody is denying Homosexuals of a sexual preference for a same-gender partner, it only has to meet the age limit now , or for marriage it can not be a Relative as the rest of us must obey too.
BUT Noooooo....we're expect to lower our standards for minorities
because they just can't help it for having the same Moral codes or free-will to obey the laws.
I still say that the Militant gays will rue the day they marched with the pro-Abortion crowds , once Science can ID the sexual-preference gene there will be no stopping the mother from a Homo-cide Abortion to protect the child from future harm.
We saw how Svend Robinson helped a handicapped females commit suicide out of his misguided compassion , so it's just a matter of time until the gay population dwindles down to well below 1% of the population and they can't do a damn thing to stop it .
Good luck with their protests to force 99% of the population to affirm their behaviour or force on us Tolerance-training for public nudity in front of Children when the abusers are males claiming to be Homosexuals.
Please read my comment properly , I do not link gays to pedophilia, only the same-gender pedophiles to the legal definition of a Homosexual-pedophile act against children.
Just as the news paper will print the truth about heterosexual pedophiles in our neighbourhood on paroll for good behaviour.
Homosexuality is a behaviour like riding a bike or driving a car? Really?
If it weren't for the fact the Thomas Sowell claims to be an intellectual, I'd swear he was educated at a community college. That's a seriously flawed analogy, particularly given the literature on the subject.
Pesonaly I can't wait for the invetable return to the courts of the SSM issue in California.
The California courts legalized SSM there and twice the people have said no. Now, of course the courts will legalize it again.
I love it. The more activist the courts insist on being the bigger the chasm between them and the majority becomes.
It seems that our benevolent, omniescient philospher kings on thier ivory benches just can't get the neandrethal public to recognize their judicial genius.
Keep it up Hollywood. Keep it up MSM. Keep up the great work judges. Keep driving that wedge deeper just to keep a few shrill gays happy for another month or two (until the next invented example of "horrifying oppression" of course).
Note how CNN and the sympathetic press is covering the 'plight' of those who lost the vote.
Much like the way the one-sided Canadian media propagandized.
In the end, there was no plebisite or refferendum in Canada on the issue - just the dictat ofjudges like Roy McMurtry and the scaremongering of the press.
Anyone who disagreed with their take on the issue was guilty of 'hate.'
Anyone who disagreed with their take on the issue was guilty of 'hate.'
If it's not outright hatred, it's always *at least* tacit assertion that all men we're not necessarily created equal.
Post a Comment